Which assumption about American leadership states that leaders are made, not born?

The assumption that leaders are made, not born, aligns with the perspective that anyone can become a leader through experience. This viewpoint emphasizes that leadership qualities can be developed over time, rather than being innate or inherent traits that one is born with. It suggests that individuals can learn, grow, and gain the necessary skills and characteristics to effectively lead others through practice, mentorship, and personal development.

This idea is particularly relevant in various contexts, including organizational settings, where individuals are often given opportunities to take on leadership roles based on their performance and readiness, rather than solely on their background or personal attributes. This belief fosters an environment where potential leaders are nurtured and cultivated, thereby reinforcing the concept that effective leadership can be achieved through deliberate effort and learning.

In contrast, the other choices reflect different assumptions about leadership. For example, the notion that leaders require formal education suggests a structured and possibly elitist view of leadership that may not consider the value of experience alone. The idea that leaders must always be in charge implies a rigid hierarchy that does not account for collaborative leadership approaches. Lastly, defining leadership as a genetic trait overlooks the significant impact of personal development and the influences of environment and experience.